First page Back Continue Last page Overview Graphics
Conclusions
- FlightGear is widely packaged, available for download
- Visual scenery has improved and is very acceptable
- Photorealism is not popular beyond proof of concept
- The simulator is suitable for use in science and teaching
- It isn't perfect; a simulation is only as good as its data
- FlightGear requires faster computers than in 2001
- The use of XML enables even technophobes to customize
- Due to the subject the project addresses
- It has many issues and unusual concerns
- Most rarely inconvenience other projects
- These elements are providing the exciting challenges
- and associated activities enjoyed by the developers
- www.flightgear.org
Notes: